🇪🇸 ES 🌐 CA 🇬🇧 EN
Neighbors of Santa Maria de l’Avall

Defending the viability of our homes

The sewerage project, as currently proposed, implies costs that, given an estimated default rate of 30%, could skyrocket the financial burden on families to over €60,000 per home.

🔢 Each signature gives us legitimacy to negotiate better conditions.
Do you know the real impact of the project on your finances?

Estimates point to costs close to €30,000 per 1,000 m² plot. Adding mandatory internal works (pumps, trenches, adaptation), the outlay exceeds €40,000. This figure, added to the apportionment of defaults (estimated at 30%), could shoot the final cost up to €60,000.

Why are we worried about this project?

We want an urbanization with adequate services, but we disagree with the approach, management, and communication of this project. We believe it has advanced without offering all the necessary information and without seeking a real consensus that protects the most vulnerable families.

Economic impact

A burden difficult to assume

The budget exceeds 13 million euros. For many neighbors, a levy of this magnitude is not just a high expense, but a real risk to their financial stability, potentially leading to critical debt situations.

Participation deficit

A decision with little visibility

Approval was made with only 76 votes in favor in an assembly where the importance of the vote was not highlighted enough. Many neighbors feel that a decision affecting more than 300 families required a broader and more transparent debate.

Legal and social risk

Administrative consequences

Regulations foresee surcharges and enforcement proceedings in case of non-payment. This situation generates uncertainty and concern, potentially creating unnecessary tensions in neighborhood coexistence if viable alternatives for everyone are not sought.

What factors influence this project?

We consider that the current project design prioritizes expansive technical and urban planning criteria, without sufficiently taking into account the social and economic reality of current residents.

  • For large landholders, urbanization is an opportunity for revaluation.
  • For the administration, it implies compliance with regulations and future revenue.
  • For resident neighbors, it means financing infrastructure whose cost seems disproportionate to the immediate benefit.

What do we propose?

This neighborhood group advocates for transparency, study of alternatives, and consensus. We ask for:

  • An independent technical review to evaluate more sustainable and economical sanitation options.
  • Ensuring that decisions of such magnitude strictly comply with desirable participation quorums.
  • Protecting families against projects that could compromise their primary residence.

Voice of the neighbors

Illustration Board and Neighbors
“A €4.3M overvaluation has been detected in the project budget presented at the previous assembly.”
Illustration Board and Neighbors
“How can an engineering firm sign a project without calculating the necessary pumping stations? How can the Board defend a document that lacks this data?”
Illustration Board and Neighbors
“A meeting that started behind closed doors between the Mayor and the President. A unilateral request for a €150,000 credit policy that we will all guarantee and a 'curious technical coincidence' on the President's plot are uncovered.”
Illustration Board and Neighbors
“The City Council supports studying cheaper and safer alternatives, but the Board accelerates with an extraordinary call full of irregularities that leads us to a financial risk we cannot assume.”
Illustration Board and Neighbors
“Breaking news! The ACA confirms that bio-purifiers can be viable, while the cost of the collector, added to pumping systems and defaults, could shoot the figure up to €60,000.”
Illustration Board and Neighbors

What is the popular clamor?

What can you do right now?

Review the documentation and opinions available on this website. Understanding the technical and legal details is the first step to defending our common interests.

Access extended information →

If you believe a review is necessary, add your signature. We need 200 adhesions so that our request has the necessary representative strength before the Board and the City Council.

I want to join and request the review

Discuss the situation with your neighbors. Ensure that elderly people or those without internet access also know the implications of this project.

Download information leaflet →

Go deeper

If you want to know the details better, here are additional resources:

A viable project starts with consensus… and your signature

Let's avoid hasty decisions that could affect the future of our homes. If you share this concern, participate.

Add my signature and support the project review

“200 signatures give us the necessary legitimacy to be heard and stop a unilateral execution.”

✍️ Join the initiative