Urbanizations are no longer a parked problem to become a priority
“approved autonomous sanitation systems of municipal ownership will be allowed provided that access to the conventional network is technically or economically unfeasible”
The sewerage project, as currently proposed, implies costs that, facing an estimated 30% default rate, could skyrocket the economic burden on families to over €60,000 per home.
Estimates point to costs close to €30,000 per 1,000 m² plot. If we add the mandatory internal works (pumps, trenches, adaptation), the outlay exceeds €40,000. This figure, added to the pro-rating of defaults (estimated at 30%), could skyrocket the final cost to up to €60,000.
We want an urbanization with adequate services, but we disagree with the approach, management, and communication of this project. We believe it has moved forward without providing all necessary information and without seeking a real consensus that protects the most vulnerable families.
The budget exceeds 13 million euros. For many neighbors, an assessment of such magnitude is not just a high expense, but a real risk to their financial stability, potentially leading to critical debt situations.
Approval was carried out with only 76 votes in favor in an assembly where the importance was not sufficiently highlighted. Decisions affecting over 300 families require broader and more transparent debate.
Regulations foresee surcharges and executive procedures in case of default. This situation generates uncertainty, potentially creating unnecessary tensions in neighborhood coexistence if alternatives are not sought.
We consider that the current design of the project prioritizes expansive technical and urban criteria, without sufficiently taking into account the social and economic reality of current residents.
This neighborhood group advocates for transparency, the study of alternatives, and consensus. We ask for:
“approved autonomous sanitation systems of municipal ownership will be allowed provided that access to the conventional network is technically or economically unfeasible”
“It has been detected that the project budget presented at the assembly has a €4.3M overvaluation.”
“How can an engineering firm sign off without calculating the pumps? How can the Board defend it?”
“The €150,000 policy that we will all guarantee is uncovered, along with a curious coincidence on the President's plot.”
“The ACA confirms that bio-purifiers can be viable. The cost of the collector could skyrocket to €60,000.”
“How is it possible to approve a million-dollar assessment without knowing who we might flood with sewage?”
Review the available documentation and opinions. Understanding the technical and legal details is the first step to defending our common interests.
See expanded documentation →If you believe a review is necessary, add your signature. We need 200 signatures to have representative strength before the Board and City Council.
Add my signature →Discuss the situation with your neighbors. Make sure the elderly or those without internet access know the implications of this project.
Download brochure →If you want to know the details better, here are additional resources:
Let's avoid hasty decisions that could affect the future of our homes. If you share this concern, participate.
Add my signature and support the review"200 signatures give us the necessary legitimacy to be heard and stop a unilateral execution."